Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Thomson Reuters Against Ross Intelligence
- A federal judge ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters against Ross Intelligence.
- The lawsuit, filed in May 2020, accused Ross of unlawfully copying Westlaw content.
- Ross used data from LegalEase Solutions to train its AI with approximately 25,000 Bulk Memos.
- Judge Bibas found Ross infringed on 2,243 Westlaw headnotes.
- Ross’s defenses, including innocent infringement and copyright misuse, were rejected.
In the legal dispute between Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence, a federal judge ruled that Ross infringed on over 2,200 Westlaw headnotes using data from LegalEase Solutions. The court dismissed all defenses presented by Ross.
Source (2.6)https://decrypt.co/305516/judge-sides-with-thomson-reuters-in-ai-copyright-dispute?rand=52368
